Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:0467f17b-f262-4e10-a286-
240c09eda047@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If we are talking about the ISFDB, then our sup****t for user defined
> "tags" is still rudimentary, but it's there, e.g. we have 79 titles
> tagged as "vampires"-related (http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/tag.cgi?
> 221).
All I see is "Name, Title, Year, Series, Publisher, ISBN", but not
keyword.
|
