Re: Larry Niven: Terrorize Latinos to Solve Health Care Crisis

John Schilling <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (David DeLaney) wrote:
>>John Schilling <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (David DeLaney) wrote:
>>>>John Schilling <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>"Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>John Schilling wrote:
>>>>>>> Whereas not three hours after I made my original statement, I
noticed
>>>>>>> the term being used, straight up, in an article in the Los Angeles
>>>>>>> times.  I didn't check the byline, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't
>>>>>>> Rush Limbaugh.  And whoever it was, seemed quite sympathetic to
>>>>>>> the liberal cause du jour he was writing about.
>
>>>>>>Given that the Times is almost entirely online these days, no doubt 
>>>>>>you can provide a URL.
>
>>>>>What an annoying, insulting little request.  Of course I *can*
provide
>>>>>a URL; is there any particular reason why I *should*?
>
>>>>Because it was your claim originally, and you're pulling this in to
sup****t
>>>>it? Reacting all like "I don't have to provide that URL! I am
insulted!
>>>><flounces off stage left>" when asked where you saw something you say
you
>>>>just recently saw and bring in as sup****t for your earlier contention
leads
>>>>most of the rest of us to think "uh-huh, doesn't actually exist". 
>
>>>"Most of the rest of us"?
>
>>>Can you provide a source for your claim that most of the rest of this
>>>newsgroup, thinks the Los Angeles Times article I referred to does not
exist?
>
>>Certainly: the fact that you have again failed to provide a link or
>>reference to it, instead typing out two paragraphs of stuff changing the
>>subject to what I might or might not think and whether you COULD be
possibly
>>mistaken. More smoke; less substance.
>
>That is not a source, that is an assertion.

Certainly: I am asserting that we think you're not providing the link
because you can't. Prove us wrong. Humiliate us with your awesome skills
and your superior net-fu. Grind us into the dust by, you know, actually
_showing_ us where to find this story that so caught your eye, so quickly
after your previous post, that you had to post back here and tell us about
it. Make us cry for mercy by smiting us with a URL or other way of
locating it.

But don't assert your superiority and try to convince us that of course
you
don't have to _provide_ it, just your say-so ought to be enough.

>Oh, much worse that cockroaches.  But enough with the weasel-wording;
>either accuse me of lying, or don't.  If nothing else, we'll get that
>out in the open.

I have no idea whether or not you're lying; all I know is that you, for a
third
time, have taken a lot of effort to try to show superiority over me and
the
rest of the newsgroup, without actually, like, giving any objective
evidence
that the thing you said existed? Exists. And you're getting redder in the
face with outrage each time, too, that we dare to question your WORD that
you saw this.

Think of this as an experimental procedure to see how long it takes before
you realize you could in fact sup****t your point. All I see is that a
lurking
newspaper sup****ts you in email ... I mean, offline. Yet you're unhappy
that
I might have said people other than me, not evident in my post, sup****ted
my
view?

Dave
-- 
\/David	DeLaney	posting	from dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "It's not the pot that	grows the
flower
It's not the clock that	slows the hour 	The definition's plain for anyone
to see
Love is	all it takes to	make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE	HAPPYNET
VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/
- net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all
CAPS! --K.