Re: Diana of the Dozen Breasts ...& Then Some

John F. Eldredge wrote:

> On Sun, 04 May 2008 15:54:03 +0000, Brenda Clough wrote:
> 
> 
>>Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>>
>>>In article
>>><9b14bdae-c5b9-4f1b-8e40-092c3b65a51b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>EdAugusts  <AugustsBks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>[68 lines of mostly advertising schnipped]
>>>
>>>ObSf: Davidson, "Great is Diana."
>>>
>>>Actually, I understand those objects hanging all over Diana of the
>>>Ephesians aren't breasts.  They're bull testicles.
>>>
>>>Dorothy J. Heydt
>>>Vallejo, California
>>>djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>Or, possibly, human.  Recall that the rites occasionally did involve
>>self-castration; doubtless the souvenirs would be preserved for the
>>inspiration of future wor****ppers.
>>
>>Brenda
> 
> 
> Well, given their size, either they are bull testicles or else the men
of 
> those days were a lot better equipped than any men are these days.  One 
> reason that the archaeologists don't think that they are breasts is that

> they lack nipples.
> 



You have just hacked off your own balls in a religious frenzy. 
The very least the artist can do is make them look real big, 
when they are displayed for future generations.

Brenda



-- 
---------
Brenda W. Clough
http://www.sff.net/people/Brenda/

Recent short fiction:
"A Mighty Fortress"
http://www.helixsf.com/archives/Jul07/index.htm