Re: Humans as raccoons?

W. Citoan wrote:

> Default User wrote:
> > 
> >  W. Citoan wrote:
> > 
> > > Default User wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  Can. Might. Not required to.
> > > 
> > > So?  Required is irrelevant.
> > 
> >  Nonsense. The other team might mean nothing to you other than as
> > your  enemy's enemy. Not required to be, of course.
> 
> So?  Then it wouldn't be used in that case...

There was no situation put forth. It was a generalization.

> >  The statement as forumulated is worthless.
> 
> It conveys information about a fan's opinion of two teams.  You may
> not find that useful, but those using it do.
> 
> If you only find worth statements that are 100% true at all times,
> then there are very few statements that you will find worthwhile.

It was put forth as a generalization. I think is worthless in that
capacity.





Brian

-- 
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)