On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:32:49 -0700 (PDT), petertrei@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On May 13, 5:01 pm, Bill Snyder <bsny...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:18:35 -0700 (PDT), petert...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 13, 4:10 pm, "davidextremewri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>> ><davidextremewri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> And now you can read best nvel 2007 (from publish america) in
[redacted] free
>> >> The style of this novel is a combination of romance , science
>> >> fiction , realism and comedy styles . And the Author will take you
to
>> >> a world full of sentiment , love and excitement by combining these
>> >> styles . In addition , the description of the stages and the feeling
>> >> of the characters are very real and by reading a paragraph of this
>> >> novel you feel that you are really in the story perimeter .
>> >> You will become familiar with a new style of writing novel . The
>> >> author has tried to show a logical fiction which is proved by
>> >> science .while you are reading the novel , you find out that you
have
>> >> believed all the events of the story . you will find out that all
>> >> these events may happen for every one and it's not very similar to
a
>> >> fiction .
>> >> The events of the story happen in New York city in 2007. The life of
>> >> the leading part of the story is full of peace but it suddenly
>> >> becomes
>> >> disturbed and he tried to adapt himself to this disturbance
>>
>> >You will find that the author can't write grammatical English.
>> >You will find that the URL listed doesn't even go to a book
>> >listing.
>>
>> Hell, the first of those is obvious from reading the spam itself.
>> And are you saying there's something *wrong* with the second one?
>
>Look at the URL very carefully. It does not say what you think it
>does. Fix it, and you do seem to get to the author's site.
>I haven't tried to read the book - the spam gave me
>enough of a headache.
>
>So yes, the author was failed to type 'wordpress' without a typo.
Perhaps you misunderstand. I don't see any strong objection to
spam whose URL leads nowhere; if anything, I'd call it a distinct
improvement on the usual kind.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
|
