Re: So, what do you reckon's going to be wrong with Amber in the final ep of House??

On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:41:35 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
<taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 04:22:09 GMT, Terry Austin
>> <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:27:49 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>> <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:18:22 -0500, Herr Oberst
>>>>><nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 18:31:13 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>>>><bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:41 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
>>>>>>>Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>Herr Oberst <nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obsession is not pretty...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>Indeed. It makes you look like a retard. But that won't
>>>>>>>>stop you. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Although it is good to see the Herr Standartenfuehrer
>>>>>>>display a little self-knowledge at last.  At this rate he
>>>>>>>could be ready for some sort of 12-step program in only a
>>>>>>>few more decades. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Neither are you (very observant, that is)...
>>>>>
>>>>>I know you are, but what am I?
>>>> 
>>>> You MIGHT want to check the headers before you make a bigger
>>>> fool out of yourself...
>> 
>>>> Hint:  Kratman posts from Google.  This person is posting from
>>>> Giganews.
>>>
>>>Which is to say, it is entirely possible that Kratman is using a
>>>news account that comes with his internet access, 
>> 
>> AOL doesn't have Usenet access anymore....
>
>Can you prove that Kratman does not have any other internet access 
>other than AOL?

I can prove he didn't post any direct replies to your posts in this
thread (he replied to you via the forger's post - IOW
<0f57386f-e0a5-43af-8436-f55e1febeabe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is
the only actually Kratman post in this thread as it shows on the House
group).

>But, more to the point, if he didn't follow me around like an 
>overexcited little puppy trying to hump my pantleg, there wouldn't 
>be much point in forging posts in his name. But he'll keep doing 
>so, because he *can't* stop himself.

You claim everyone follows you around humping your pants leg.  That
you claim it here isn't very convincing.

Just a conjecture, but I suspect that the forger is making fun of your
constant claims that X "will reply to this."

It IS amusing how you and Snyder practically wet yourselves over the
notion that he had, in fact, replied.  And THAT is worth the price of
admission.

>>>rather than Google as he 
>>>usually does. Perhaps he doesn't often use that news account
>>>because he's gotten in trouble in the past for stalking, or
>>>something. 
>>>
>>>Tommie Kratman will reply to this, because that's why my *****
>>>does. 
>
>Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he can't 
>stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.

Funny, he hasn't yet in this thread...
-- 
"No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who 
 does not want to adopt a rational attitude."
    Sir Karl Popper