"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:69uo249s9ulqdrg164817i4tga0t90564h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:41:35 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
> Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 04:22:09 GMT, Terry Austin
>>> <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:27:49 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>>> <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:18:22 -0500, Herr Oberst
>>>>>><nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 18:31:13 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>>>>><bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:41 GMT, Gutless Umbrella
>>>>>>>>Carrying Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Herr Oberst <nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Obsession is not pretty...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Indeed. It makes you look like a retard. But that won't
>>>>>>>>>stop you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Although it is good to see the Herr Standartenfuehrer
>>>>>>>>display a little self-knowledge at last. At this rate he
>>>>>>>>could be ready for some sort of 12-step program in only a
>>>>>>>>few more decades.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Neither are you (very observant, that is)...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I know you are, but what am I?
>>>>>
>>>>> You MIGHT want to check the headers before you make a bigger
>>>>> fool out of yourself...
>>>
>>>>> Hint: Kratman posts from Google. This person is posting
>>>>> from Giganews.
>>>>
>>>>Which is to say, it is entirely possible that Kratman is using
>>>>a news account that comes with his internet access,
>>>
>>> AOL doesn't have Usenet access anymore....
>>
>>Can you prove that Kratman does not have any other internet
>>access other than AOL?
>
> I can prove he didn't post any direct replies to your posts in
> this thread (he replied to you via the forger's post - IOW
> <0f57386f-e0a5-43af-8436-f55e1febeabe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > is the only actually Kratman post in this thread as it shows
> on the House group).
Which is to say, you can't prove he's not sock puppeting himself.
>
>>But, more to the point, if he didn't follow me around like an
>>overexcited little puppy trying to hump my pantleg, there
>>wouldn't be much point in forging posts in his name. But he'll
>>keep doing so, because he *can't* stop himself.
>
> You claim everyone follows you around humping your pants leg.
> That you claim it here isn't very convincing.
He's followed me in to a number of other groups from rasw. It's
****ing hysterical, but even more so when he whines that someone
takes it amiss and starts impersonating him.
>
> Just a conjecture, but I suspect that the forger is making fun
> of your constant claims that X "will reply to this."
Or Tommie's obsession with me to the point that he follows me
around usenet, like an overexcited little puppy trying to hump my
pantlet.
>
> It IS amusing how you and Snyder practically wet yourselves over
> the notion that he had, in fact, replied. And THAT is worth the
> price of admission.
I'm happy for you. Bill's finally starting to learn to not be a
dumbass. You, of course, are hopeless.
And now *you're* my *****, too. Tommie will be jealous.
>
>>>>rather than Google as he
>>>>usually does. Perhaps he doesn't often use that news account
>>>>because he's gotten in trouble in the past for stalking, or
>>>>something.
>>>>
>>>>Tommie Kratman will reply to this, because that's why my *****
>>>>does.
>>
>>Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he can't
>>stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.
>
> Funny, he hasn't yet in this thread...
You're only scoring me more point, son. Really. He's so hooked
*you're* hooked.
Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he can't
stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.
--
Terry Austin
"There's no law west of the internet."
- Nick Stump
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
|
