On Sat, 17 May 2008 03:07:38 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
<taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:55:26 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
>> Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:41:35 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
>>>> Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 04:22:09 GMT, Terry Austin
>>>>>> <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:27:49 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>>>>>> <bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:18:22 -0500, Herr Oberst
>>>>>>>>><nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 18:31:13 -0500, Bill Snyder
>>>>>>>>>><bsnyder@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:41 GMT, Gutless Umbrella
>>>>>>>>>>>Carrying Sissy <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Herr Oberst <nrvlaw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obsession is not pretty...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Indeed. It makes you look like a retard. But that won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>stop you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Although it is good to see the Herr Standartenfuehrer
>>>>>>>>>>>display a little self-knowledge at last. At this rate
>>>>>>>>>>>he could be ready for some sort of 12-step program in
>>>>>>>>>>>only a few more decades.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Neither are you (very observant, that is)...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I know you are, but what am I?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You MIGHT want to check the headers before you make a
>>>>>>>> bigger fool out of yourself...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hint: Kratman posts from Google. This person is posting
>>>>>>>> from Giganews.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Which is to say, it is entirely possible that Kratman is
>>>>>>>using a news account that comes with his internet access,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AOL doesn't have Usenet access anymore....
>>>>>
>>>>>Can you prove that Kratman does not have any other internet
>>>>>access other than AOL?
>>>>
>>>> I can prove he didn't post any direct replies to your posts in
>>>> this thread (he replied to you via the forger's post - IOW
>>>> <0f57386f-e0a5-43af-8436-f55e1febeabe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> om>
>>>> is the only actually Kratman post in this thread as it shows
>>>> on the House group).
>>>
>>>Which is to say, you can't prove he's not sock puppeting
>>>himself.
>>
>> THINK about it, Austin.
>>
>> How would I KNOW that it wasn't him?
Not smart enough to figure it out, Austin? How sad for you.
>>>>>But, more to the point, if he didn't follow me around like an
>>>>>overexcited little puppy trying to hump my pantleg, there
>>>>>wouldn't be much point in forging posts in his name. But he'll
>>>>>keep doing so, because he *can't* stop himself.
>>>>
>>>> You claim everyone follows you around humping your pants leg.
>>>> That you claim it here isn't very convincing.
>>>
>>>He's followed me in to a number of other groups from rasw. It's
>>>****ing hysterical, but even more so when he whines that someone
>>>takes it amiss and starts impersonating him.
>>>>
>>>> Just a conjecture, but I suspect that the forger is making fun
>>>> of your constant claims that X "will reply to this."
>>>
>>>Or Tommie's obsession with me to the point that he follows me
>>>around usenet, like an overexcited little puppy trying to hump
>>>my pantlet.
>>>>
>>>> It IS amusing how you and Snyder practically wet yourselves
>>>> over the notion that he had, in fact, replied. And THAT is
>>>> worth the price of admission.
>>>
>>>I'm happy for you. Bill's finally starting to learn to not be a
>>>dumbass. You, of course, are hopeless.
>>>
>>>And now *you're* my *****, too. Tommie will be jealous.
>>
>> This Made Me Laugh.
>>
>> As long as you continue to babble about how this was Kratman,
>> you're MY *****, *****.
>>
>>>>>>>rather than Google as he
>>>>>>>usually does. Perhaps he doesn't often use that news account
>>>>>>>because he's gotten in trouble in the past for stalking, or
>>>>>>>something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tommie Kratman will reply to this, because that's why my
>>>>>>>***** does.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he
>>>>>can't stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.
>>>>
>>>> Funny, he hasn't yet in this thread...
>>>
>>>You're only scoring me more point, son. Really. He's so hooked
>>>*you're* hooked.
>>>
>>>Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he can't
>>>stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.
>>
>> You keep telling yourself that...
>
>I don't need to, son. *You* keep telling me that.
You're delusional. I haven't told you that "Tommie Kratman will, of
course, reply to this, because he can't stop himself."
>Tommie Kratman will, of course, reply to this, because he can't
>stop himself. That's what makes him my *****.
Get help. Seriously.
--
"Get next to a clue and hope the wind blows, dude."
- Fitzbo
|
