Re: Where Do Darwinist Atheists Get Their Moral Values?

On May 17, 1:41=A0am, thro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Wayne Throop) wrote:
> : veritas <khogan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> : You of course may be right, we are just primate prodigies. =A0But
about
> : 10,000 Adult DNA combinations all at once?
>
> I don't see anything that says they had to arise simultaneously.
> Just because there was a population bottleneck doesn't indicate there
> were no precursors that led to that population.
>
> : I think it went like this: if your DNA is a 100% match, you could be
> : four generations back related, if you DNA is ONE gene off than you can
> : be twelve generations back related. =A0They were 26-28 markers
different=

> : than us. =A0That makes them no kin unless you use the mathematical
> : theory, and that is what it is, a theory, than a million years ago we
> : could have been related.
>
> I think you're, at best, confused. =A0We use the "mathematical theory"
> every day to resolve paternity tests; these are not "100 percent
matches"
> by any stretch of the imagination, they are much more complicated than
tha=
t.
> And if you find the same genes in apes and humans (and we do) then it's
no=

> mathematical theory that we are related SOME time in the past. =A0The
only=

> question arises in estimating when.
>
> The point is, "no kin" simply doesn't mean what you seem to think it
does.=

>
> Wayne Throop =A0 thro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 =A0http://sheol.org/throopw

Ah, I need to look that information up as after I wrote 100% nobody is
100% unless they are twins or really strange.  But, the one gene, 4
generations back related maybe, and two, 12 generations back related
maybe.  I need to find that information again, I think it's in a book
in my library.  I should have looked it up before I posted.  As for
the old species, they do have ears, noses, hands, five fingers, five
toes, knees, a spine (not like some on here), so one would have to
assume we are related sometime in the past.  It is common sense.  It's
just where did the superior ones come from?  And if they weren't all
together at sometime how could they have bred more little superior
babies?  How would there be enough to start roaming all over the world
killing everything they saw?  The answer is somewhere, just where?
But paternity tests are 100% accurate, as the relation is so close.
Ask those judges who make the men pay even if they swear they never
saw the girl.  They will confirm it.  They are great scientists.
Regards, Ken Hogan