Re: David Gerrold - War with the Cthorr

On Mon, 19 May 2008 22:15:07 GMT, Wayne Throop <throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>According to physics, there's no difference.  In fact, there's really
>not a physical fact about "who had the original particles", to one way
>of thinking.  A particle is a particle is a particle.  Indeed, the fact
>that particles have no hair (so to type) is why people can speculate
>that all the electrons in the universe are actually one particle that
>keeps bouncing back and forth between the begining and end of time,
>and encoutering itself a kajillion times in between.  Speculate, and
>actually sort of keep a half-straight face while doing so.  Kinda.

And if you're Feynman, you can actually draw pictures of it, which
translate
into various horrendously complex integrals, which can actually be
evaluated
modulo (in the exact meaning) some infinite quantities.

Dave
-- 
\/David	DeLaney	posting	from dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "It's not the pot that	grows the
flower
It's not the clock that	slows the hour 	The definition's plain for anyone
to see
Love is	all it takes to	make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE	HAPPYNET
VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/
- net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all
CAPS! --K.