Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Written > Re: Needle (was...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 31 of 66 Topic 21289 of 22908
Post > Topic >>

Re: Needle (was Re: A different trans****tation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES)

by "Mike stone" <mwstone@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 23, 2008 at 01:50 PM

<tkmailers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:g15mbu$pkl$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike stone wrote:
> > "Mike Stone" <mwstone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >
news:b0f3f648-d525-4bfa-9c04-9f371516c72b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On May 4, 9:22?pm, "Dan Tilque" <dtil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yes. As somebody once said on another thread, it has a kind of
> >> "timeless" air to it. In that, imho, it rather resembles _The Day of
> >> the Triffids_. Both are in some ways _more_ topical now than >when
theywere
> > written.
> >
> >
> > Just had a couple more thoughts on the "dated" question.
> >
> > Hunting round google groups just before rasw disappeared from it, I
> > discovered an earlier review of _Needle_, in which someone thought it
dated
> > because a person growing into adolescence seems to have no problem
with
a
> > being inhabiting his body and observing his every action.
> >
> > Personally, though, I suspect this has more to do with the
personalities
> > than the times. Clement's juvenile characters (almost always male) are
> > pretty consistently extrovert types, not given to self-consciousness
or
> > sensitivity. In this, I suspect they reflect Clement himself. Wasn't
he
a
> > scoutmaster or something? So perhaps it isn't so surprising.
> >
> > Mention of adolescence, however, brings me on to a glaringly "dated"
aspect
> > of the book, on which nobody (myself included up to now) has so far
> > commented. The complete absence of girls.
> >
> > Offhand, I can only recall two female characters in _Needle_. Bob's
mother
> > appears a few times, but is barely more than a voice off stage, a bit
like
> > the narrator's wife in Wells' _War of the Worlds_.  Miss Rand, the
resident
> > nurse at Bob's school, is at least named, but makes only a very brief
> > appearence in Ch 4. Apart from them, the cast (as in much sf of that
> > vintage) is exclusively male. As far as the opposite *** is concerned,
Bob
> > might as well have remained at his boarding school [1].
> >
> > Not that Bob seems to mind. He is fifteen, but still isn't showing the
> > slightest interest in girls, and if any of his friends do we are never
told
> > about it [2]. They seem to take an all-male "universe" for granted.
> >
> > I find it curious that commentators have been so slow to remark on
this.
Is
> > it something we take so much for granted in older sf that we simply
don't
> > notice it?
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] I'm not sure if we are ever actually _told_ that the school is for
boys
> > only, but given the era I think this can probably be assumed.
> >
> > [2] A modern novelist might offer an explanation for it, but in 1949
one
> > there was of course no question of _that_.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Stone - Peterborough, England
> >
> > You can tell what God thinks of money by looking at the people He
> > gives it to.
>
> Could this not be because they were irrelevant to plot? I read _Needle_
> less than 3 months back, & was thinking only of the boy, his alien host,
> & the alien fugitive. All other characters were sort of background.
>
> This outlook may also be individual specific, of course.


I think it was genre specific too, at least for the time. There are few
female characters in Eric Frank Russell's work either. '50s sf was like
that. I suspect that a similar book today would include at least a passing
reference to such matters.



>
> Thing that I found most curious in the story was, however, the ease with
> which the fugitive was caught. He had time, & chose to stay on the
> island! How likely would detection have been had he really moved around
> earth & ended up in a little village in Peru, say?
>


Doesn't even have to be a village. He could lose himself pretty thoroughly
in LA or Mexico City.

Basically, he had to be kept on the Island for there to be any realistic
chance of catching him. Perhaps he assumed smugly that even if found there
was not a lot the Hunter could do to him, so he didn't worry very much.
Iirc
he came over as an arrogant so and so.

I felt that "Problem Three" at the end was also a bit contrived. After
all,
they were all at Doc Seever's surgery, and Seever knew the situation. Why
not just fill Bob's father in on what had been happening? It wouldn't need
to go any further, save presumably to his mother, and between them they
could probably concoct a "cover story" to explain the fire. I suspect
Clement just wanted a slightly "fun" ending and didn't trouble too much
about plausibility.

Still, enough nitpicks. It's still well worth a read.


--

Mike Stone - Peterborough, England

You can tell what God thinks of money by looking at the people He gives it
to.
 




 66 Posts in Topic:
Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 13:35:29 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
P. Taine <user@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 17:53:18 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Gene <gene@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 18:19:56 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
sef@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S  2008-05-03 17:43:40 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-03 17:54:41 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-05-03 10:49:38 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-03 12:39:26 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-05-04 07:15:40 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-05-04 00:06:29 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-04 13:42:50 
A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLING S
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-04 15:14:51 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-05-04 08:03:28 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-04 15:54:15 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-04 12:39:53 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-04 19:12:17 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
mstemper@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 11:37:57 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Graham Woodland <gray@  2008-05-10 14:50:31 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Eric D. Berge <eric_be  2008-05-04 10:03:27 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-05-04 13:30:33 
Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside fr
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-05-04 20:22:03 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
"Dan Tilque" &l  2008-05-04 21:43:40 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
Lawrence Watt-Evans <l  2008-05-04 18:04:30 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-05-04 18:56:52 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 17:51:28 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-05-04 20:20:00 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
Ann Burlingham <annb@[  2008-05-16 00:02:02 
Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Aside from THE ROLLI
cryptoguy <treifamily@  2008-05-05 06:48:17 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
Mike Stone <mwstone@[E  2008-05-20 09:31:01 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
"Mike stone" &l  2008-05-21 13:54:07 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
tkmailers@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-23 11:26:50 
Re: Needle (was Re: A different transportation threada (Re: Asid
"Mike stone" &l  2008-05-23 13:50:31 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
JXStern <JXSternChange  2008-05-03 19:38:35 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
tphile <tphile@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 17:44:18 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-05-05 06:14:24 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@[  2008-05-06 08:08:34 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Lonlaz <lonlazarus@[EM  2008-05-06 08:38:55 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
JXStern <JXSternChange  2008-05-10 02:31:46 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Rich Horton <rrhorton@  2008-05-03 14:57:32 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES -- YASID?
P. Taine <user@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 23:43:09 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES -- YASID?
ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-04 04:16:50 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-05-03 16:18:32 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
douglas winston <dougl  2008-05-03 16:59:06 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-05-03 14:12:42 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
peterwezeman@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-03 14:29:07 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
"Brion K. Lienhart&q  2008-05-03 15:33:12 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
lal_truckee <lal_truck  2008-05-03 19:44:08 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Taki Kogoma <quirk@[EM  2008-05-03 18:27:59 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
jgamble@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-05 14:49:50 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Mark_Reichert@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 17:19:53 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
"David M. Palmer&quo  2008-05-03 18:40:21 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
christoph <xristoph@[E  2008-05-03 21:29:12 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-04 04:19:41 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Daphne Brinkerhoff <ce  2008-05-04 09:59:34 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Jerry Brown <jerry@[EM  2008-05-04 23:29:04 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
news <news@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 03:14:24 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
griffon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-05 09:47:43 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Vivian Darkbloom <vivi  2008-05-05 14:44:01 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Nicholas Waller <testo  2008-05-06 05:33:00 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 09:55:45 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-05-06 13:17:00 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-07 20:27:28 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-05-08 03:52:58 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
trawsars@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 21:29:56 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Ann Burlingham <annb@[  2008-05-16 00:03:31 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
Mad Hamish <newsunspam  2008-05-17 13:45:38 
Re: Aside from THE ROLLING STONES
ErictheTolle@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-21 15:29:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 12:32:28 CST 2008.